Page 400

The page uses the language of lessons and geometry to argue against simple lines of movement or origin.

Its statements feel philosophical but remain slightly skewed, which is part of their interest. The page rejects straightness both literally and historically, then turns toward where people come from as a problem that cannot be settled by neat diagrams.

Cast in the dry idiom of a syllabus - 'the first lesson', 'the second' - this six-line page sets two propositions against each other. The first denies geometry's founding axiom, that 'a straight line between / two points is impossible', and the second oddly insists that 'the area where people came from / is not confusing'. The mismatch is the point: the page lets a confident claim about origins sit next to a flat refusal of straight paths, so that certainty about where people come from reads as the more dubious lesson of the two.