Page 6
By Jack Joseph Smith
By Jack Joseph Smith
Original Scan
AI Interpretation
"There" imagines the self as present in private retreat and historical catastrophe, then adds a handwritten refusal that hatred and conquest will actually be done with.
The refrain "I was there" refuses innocence; it treats withdrawal, failure, and historical violence as connected forms of participation. Paris, Rome, Leo, and Atila are not decorative references but evidence that the same drama keeps replaying. The handwritten ending hardens the irony by denying the typed hope that bloodshed will be finished.
'There' builds a refrain of guilty presence - 'When I chickened out,' 'When I had a song; and left it' - and stretches it across history to 'Paris ... in fifty two before Christ' and 'four fifty two after Jesus at the gates / of Rome ... with Leo talking to Atila.' The speaker frames cowardice and conquest as the same recurring event, then refuses his own consolation: the typed hope that bloodshed 'will continue to be done with' is overruled by the capitalized verdict 'Which they won't, and DOES NOT.'