Page 11

The poem reduces loyalty to a hard rule: honor the first commitment and do not split yourself between two people.

The opening contrast between a garden and a crowded avenue removes setting as an excuse, because the rule applies anywhere. Promise is treated as singular and binding rather than flexible. The short lines make the statement sound like a stern personal ethic rather than a meditation.

A spoken code of loyalty: 'I DON'T CARE IF ITS A GARDEN / OR A CROWDED AVENUE', 'You never promise two people / You deal with the first person / No matter what comes up.'

The all-caps opening shouts down setting as a variable - garden or avenue, paradise or chaos, the rule holds either way - so the poem's first move is to make its ethic place-agnostic. The core is the prohibition against double-promising and the duty to 'the first person', loyalty fixed by sequence rather than circumstance. 'No matter what comes up' seals it against the very contingencies the title already dismissed, refusing any exception. The flat, declarative lines and the shift from shouted setup to plain statement give it the texture of a personal commandment spoken aloud, closer to a creed than a lyric. The source spelling 'ITS' is left as written.