Page 4
By Jack Joseph Smith
By Jack Joseph Smith
Original Scan
AI Interpretation
The poem is a raw confession of murderous anger that struggles to square itself with intellect and Christian conscience.
Violence is named without disguise and without temporary excuse, which gives the opening its force. The speaker keeps testing that fury against ideas of mind, truth, evil, and justification, as if thought can expose the false but cannot fully stop the urge to kill. The closing line turns chillingly casual, making the whole outburst feel like both a moral crisis and a grim boast.
A present-tense confession of homicidal anger - 'I have those I want to murder' - that keeps trying to pass itself off as conscience, invoking 'Jesus and Dostoyevsky' before collapsing into the casual boast 'I just got away with it kid'.
The poem insists the violence is real and not 'pro-tem', no passing mood, then spends its length trying to dignify the urge by ranking it alongside writers who took evil seriously. The self-interrupting line 'For a second I went to be kind / in remembering the spelling' is telling: even mid-rage the speaker is fussing over how a word is spelled, betraying that the mind he 'believe[s] in' is partly a vanity that can 'not tolerate the false' yet 'does justify' the wish to kill. The Mountain Europeans 'on gossipp hate' give the grievance a specific, almost comic provincial source. Then the last couplet drops the whole moral scaffolding - 'The Hell of it is / I just got away with it kid' - reframing the tirade as something already survived and recounted, with that final 'kid' turning a murder confession into a wink. The retained spellings 'pro-tem', 'gossipp', and 'can not' belong to the same unguarded voice.