Page 183
By Jack Joseph Smith
By Jack Joseph Smith
Original Scan
AI Interpretation
The machanical nightingale story becomes the boy's own allegory of damage, because he can no longer accept soft fairy-tale forms without twisting them into something harsher.
This is a strong page about what hardship does to imagination. The boy's version of the story is both wounded and intelligent, and Jaugeline's response tries to defend some part of feeling from being fully mechanized.
The boy retells 'the Chinese story about the machanical nightingale', but warps it 'into something somewhat fierce', as 'all child's stories had to change for him, with the slow distruction of his delicate youth'. In his version the 'real nightingales' may enter the castle only while the mechanical one 'was wound up to sing like them'; caught with it off, 'the cats would eat them alive'. Jiven Joe, who knows the tale, objects 'You've shortened the story into deformity', and the boy answers with chilling clarity: 'I'm telling you why I want to be wound up, and you know what I need.' Jaugeline refuses the bargain - 'You're no toy; and pussy cats ain't what you think your feeling!' - reading the sexual menace under his fable.